One of our biggest problems we face when travelling
in space, is the atrophy our bodies endure while in microgravity. The astronauts on the
international space station have to exercise several times a day to maintain their bone
and muscle strength. But is there an alternative? Can we create Artificial Gravity?
I’m sure you have seen the idea before in movies like 2001: A Space Odyssey where the
entire space station spins to create an artificial gravity. The people inside can now walk comfortably
just like just on earth. It does this by exploiting centrifugal force.
Now it seems that whenever someone mentions centrifugal force, angry mobs will show up
in the comment section. Declaring it isn’t real. Which just isn’t the case. Let’s
see why NASA developed this huge centrifuge to test
the possibility of simulated gravity back in the 1960s. Here we are looking from inertial
frame of reference, that just means we are looking from outside perspective and we can
clearly see that there is no force pulling this guy outwards. It is just his inertia
carrying him forward, and the floor he is walking on provides the centripetal force
to prevent him from flying off. But what happens if our reference frame moves
with the astronaut. This is called a rotating reference frame, or a non-inertial reference
frame. To him, the rest of the world is moving, and he is standing stationary. In this reference
frame centrifugal force is absolutely a real and measurable force, pushing him downwards
just like gravity. The only thing that is fictitious is his perception of what is causing
it. This occurs because in physics and engineering,
we must balance forces. The system has to be in equilibrium. Newton’s third law states
for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
So if centripetal force exists in this reference frame there has to be a force pushing him
outwards. That is centrifugal force. And the moment the rotation stops it vanishes again.
So if this works so well, why haven’t we seen a spinning space station yet? Well one
problem is size. To make this practical we need a massive ship, which would be incredibly
expensive to get into orbit. The acceleration your body will experience
is directly proportional to speed and radius of the space station. We can calculate the
gravity Space Station V from 2001: A Space Odyssey would generate with some pretty simple
math. The space station V had a diameter of 300 meters and spun on it’s axis once every
60 seconds. That would put its gravity at about the same
as the moons. For it to have a gravity similar to earths it would need to spin once every
24 seconds. If were to make this a realistic size, let’s
say the same size as the international space station. It would need to spin once every
10 seconds. This would probably be pretty disorientating, just ask Sandra bullock.
Another problem we face on smaller stations like this, is the gradient in acceleration
you would experience. Because the acceleration is directly proportional to the distance to
would force the blood to your feet, just like when you spin a bucket of water around. This
effect will diminish with a larger stations. So to make a practical space station with
artificial gravity the station would have to be huge, which is simply too expensive.
Besides, the ISS is most valuable to us as a laboratory to test the effects of microgravity.
But what if money was not an issue. What would it take to get a space ship like Elysium,
built for the mega rich as an escape from turmoil on earth, into orbit?
Elysium dwarves Space Station V measuring in at 60 kilometers wide and it is estimated
to weigh about a million metric tons. Space x can currently launch a kilogram into space
for about 2720 dollars, with their falcon 9 rocket. This will be reduced to about 1650
dollars per kilo when they launch their falcon heavy variant at the end of the year. But
it would take over 18 thousand launches to bring the one million metric tonnes to low
earth orbit, that’s 1.65 trillion dollars to just get the materials of Elysium into
space with current technologies. Then we have to worry about the costs of materials and
engineering that would go into building something of this magnitude.
That is far more difficult to calculate, but we can take some clues from the ISS. It is
estimated to have cost about 150 billion in total. It took 36 shuttle flights at a cost
of 1.4 billion each to bring the materials to space. That’s a total of 50.4 billion
dollars. So the launch costs were just 33% of the total cost. A conservative estimate
for the costs of Elysium could be put at 5 trillion dollars. That’s 62.3 Bill Gates,
but there are half a million people on board Elysium, so if the cost was split between
everyone that would be about 10 million each. That isn’t so far-fetched and the price
of space travel is destined to reduce in the future.
We do have materials strong enough to build a structure like this. The forces on Elysium
would be similar to the ISS, other than the additional stress created by centripetal and
centrifugal force. It’s interesting to note that the designers of Elysium took note of
this. The stress in a spinning structure like this would decrease as you move away from
the rotational center. This means it would need a stronger structure the closer you get
to the center. This clearly influenced their design with these tapering spokes. But we
run into some problems when we realize there isn’t enough aluminum in the world to build
this thing. It would take at least 10 years’ worth of the world’s total aluminum production
just to build the structure. This would cause a huge surge in the cost of the material.
An alternative method could be sourcing the materials from space. This could reduce the
launch costs and there is plenty of metallic material available on the moon and on near
earth asteroids. So this technology is definitely possible,
our only barriers are launch costs and material availability. Something on the scale of Space
Station V would be easily achievable, who knows maybe we’ll be travelling to space
as tourists in the near future. Once again thanks for watching, I have a little
bonus for you at the end of this outro, you can skip ahead or wait to watch it. I’d
like to thank my Patreon supporters Bastien, Nick and FG for helping me revise this video.
Your support is really appreciated. Thank you. If you would like to see more content
accounts are below. So I promised to include this in my last video,
but I couldn’t figure out how to include it in this video in a seamless way. The centrifugal
governor was used in the industrial revolution to control the amount of steam entering the
steam piston. Which was essential as the supply and demand can vary with fuel and load.
For example if the engineer puts more coal into the boiler, the pressure will rise and
these masses spin faster, which increases the centrifugal force and pushes them outwards.
This raises this sleeve up which in turn closes the valve to reduce the amount of steam entering
the engine. So the centrifugal governor acts as a sensor to provide direct mechanical feedback
to control the speed of the engine. It is one of my favorite inventions of the industrial
revolution. Thanks for watching till the end everyone. Hope you liked the video and feel

## 100 thoughts on “Can We Create Artificial Gravity?”

1. Ray Beaulieu says:

Good video. Thanks.

2. Just a Human says:

we need grab the material from moon

3. Michael Hoffman says:

Space Station V? it is a roman numeral ………..5

4. Prue Phillip says:

Okay, I approved of this video 'cos it's interesting. Only, it didn't really address the issues at hand, just the cost of building a sci-fi space station.

5. chales dor says:

Well, then why not just go on to the moon and set up there.

6. wulphstein says:

Abstract
Use a laser to split a laser beam into two sets of photons,
p1 and p2, that are connected by a special kind of hypothetical entanglement
a small piece of spacetime.  Use
centrifuges to redshift p1 photons, blueshift p2 photons.  The idea is to induce a time dilation across
the thread.  Since it’s a piece of
spacetime, then it should acquire a length contraction as well, which is qualitatively
like a curvature.  The output of a laser
beam would be a curvature beam.  A curvature
beam would act like a tractor beam.

7. RianCesarea Editing Class says:

maybe we have to colonialized the moon first.. then we use the materials from the moon to create the elysium.. i thought it is way more cheaper then send the materials from earth.. first there is plenty of metal on moon.. second, moon has lower gravity which make it easier to launch the rocket.. third, there is water in asteroid and moon for rocket fuel.. am i right?

8. Cody Shakespeare says:

I know this video is old but you should do a video on artificial gravitiy in a rod. Essenstially, it'd be a spacecraft shaped as a long tube (which for the most part they are anyway). The tube would then be spun after reaching its desired orbit or perhaps after doing its last burn sending it to Mars. At the tips of the tube would be 1 G where the astronauts would sleep and exercise to maximize the benefits. This removes the need for a massive space station to avoid differential acceleration. Also, it is in general a much more resource efficient method to achieve artificial gravity.

9. Bass Fishing with the AntiChrist says:

How is any of this more important than healthcare?

10. Neil McLean says:

If you want gravity, just stay on Earth. Save your Bill Gates for something else.

11. Nojatha says:

Okay, but can we make artificial gravity WITHOUT centripetal force? Like a planetoid?

12. Bryce Doganer says:

As a Marine Engineer I immediately fell in love with mechanical Diesel governors. ?

13. mike EFC says:

it so simple, just charge the space ships deck with a strong + charge, this will pull on the electrons in your body holding you to the deck..when man wakes up and realises gravity is no a 'REAL' force but is in fact a result of the combined electric charge of an object pulling on space time, creating the zone of negative 'universal' pressure, I don't know any other way of explaining this, which we refer to as a gravity well, it is really obvious that space time is real a light waves which are travelling through it are bent when they pass within a 'gravity well'..i'm sorry I don't have the linguistic skills to explain this easily, so it kinda doesn't or maybe does make sense…

14. Akbar Umarov says:

А русские субтитры где блять?

15. Rata 4U says:

It's too bad none of us will be around for the next epoch of human civilization when money no longer hinders our dreams. In the new epoch we build whatever we want.

16. Flo says:

By this logic anytime you gain momentum or slowdown you create artificial gravity. Sounds dumb? Yeah, cause it is.

17. jack2010jack says:

Gravity is a force between two non-touching objects.

18. Ploni Almoni says:

What about if you need to walk in the opposite direction of the spinning? or towards the middle? or spend time in the middle?

19. WaiteDavidMSPhysics says:

It isn't a real force moron. If the mobs are angry its because you are promoting crap in the place of physics.

20. FlammeundFeuer says:

0:34

Exactly, it is not real.You mention the observation of a rotating object from a position in an inertial system and confirm the absence of such a thing as centrifugal force. However your claim that this just meant that you were simply looking at something "from an outside perspective" is horribly wrong. That may be what it comes down to subjectively in many real cases, but "inertial system" is a system that'sspecified in its kinetic and kinematic properties purely by its inertia; effectively meaning that there's no alien force applied to it and it does not rotate, for then any mass element of the object would be accelerated to a certain degree in some direction at any given time. Then you make the very mistake that makes the claim of a true centrifugal force wrong: "from the point of view of the astronaut…" is a point of view that's not inertial. Identifying forces within such a system is invalid; it would become inconsistent with movement and acceleration, a change of direction and most important: if it was equivalent you would have to consider Coriolis forces real forces, meaning forces could appear anywhere at any time. You need the inertial pov to explain it, but you dont need the restricted pov from within.Thats why inertial systems are superior systems to base your origin in.
And yet there's no question that this technique can generate "artificial gravitation",although I'd prefer the term "apparent gravity", since it relies upon "apparent forces" rather than "artificial forces" and because the notion of artificiality itself is retarded in most cases anyway. The apparent force is the centripetal force that you feel pulling you in to change your direction of movement. Your feeling of that force is what you call centrifugal force, but since your inetia is responsible, it actually pulls to the rotational center. There must be no centrifugal force,because in this case you would experience no change direction of movement, which, obviously on the absolute scale, does take place, i.e. you would not travel in a curve around the center, i.e. there would be no rotation, i.e. no force whatsoever, which however was your premise in the first place. Contradictive in itself.

21. Ben L. Jackson says:

Wouldn't this only work in orbit or at speeds similar to Earth's orbit speed?

22. Frosty31 says:

No, because Gravity isnt real.

23. Ergaler says:

fuck the future money is important

24. Abhishek Patel says:

Goku is calling.

25. Satans Assistant says:

Using gravity, we can create gravity.

26. Dan Keohane says:

This was fascinating… at risk of repeating a question from way down below, if ring is not Elysium sized but 2001: ASO station sized, or perhaps a wee bit smaller, the issue with blood rushing to feet sounds like a major problem. This would, I imagine, have a lot of health risks?

27. acoe Corey R says:

Over the life of the F-35 fighter jet it will cost tax payers over a trillion dollers so we can afford it apparently

But gravity doesn't exist!
– Just ask any Trump supporter.
Oh, and the Earth is flat.
And the coal industry is coming back.
And the US economy s doing great.

29. 611 Coin says:

Why not just have a weak magnet and wear light magnet suits?

30. Sebastian m says:

Economics 101. RESOURCES are limited. The cost of space travel is constant because the amount of energy it takes to get that limited resource to LEO.
Given that the shuttle never made it out of prototype, we don't have a commercial estimate, that is until SpaceX.
Either way, man semi/permanently in space is still a work of fiction.

31. Viquin Gaming says:

Just put magnets on your shoes so you can walk everywhere inside

32. Scott Whitley says:

*Simply too expensive*. the the US, EU, Australia and Canada spend over a trillion a year on defence. I’m sure we could afford to build this.

33. TheCasualJackass says:

The most likely outcome is outer space manufacturing

34. Andrew Hansen says:

… centrifugal force isn't a force. CENTRIPICAL force is a force it's just the actual name of the force you're thinking of

35. Dapstur Slays says:

If you make the circle have pods on each sides with a completely flat floor you get rid of most of your problems.

36. philipchek says:

1:18 "In this reference frame centrifugal force is absolutly a real and measurable force" : so a supposed physical force that is unreal in one reference frame, may becomes physically real when you change the reference frame. Interresting.

37. philipchek says:

1:38 "If centripetal force exist in this reference frame, there has to be a force pushing him outwards, that is centrifugal force". No.
But where is the centripetal force ?
First of all:
If we imagine the situation in space and without rotation, there will be no centripetal force that will push man towards the centre. Some may think of the soil reaction… but so it will mean that the soil reacts to the weight of the man… while we are in weightlessness. The man will not press on the soil. And if he tries to do so with his muscles, the soil will react in any direction depending of the direction of the pressure, not in a specific centripetal direction. So there's no specific centripetal force in this situation.
Then :
If we rotate the thing, there is still no centripetal force, why would it suddenly appear ? But the soil will pushe the man tangentially to the circle, and this at every moment. On the other hand, by inertia, his body should go straight into space, like the stone of a slingshot, but the ground prevents him from doing so, and then he can then believe he is undergoing a force of gravity or a centrifugal force, but he is not.
His sensation is not subjected to a force whose direction would be centrifugal, but to a frictional (and tangential) force due to the motion of the ground.
And in fact, the man will be able to do many experiments to discover he is in a rotating system, if he drops his pen he will see that it doesn't fall back at his feet, etc.
What's really unfortunate is that you're talking about "angry mobs" who say centrifugal force doesn't exist. It's about science and arguments, there's no reason to be "angry".
We have all learned in school that centrifugal force, or that hot air is lighter than cold air. And then, listening to a particular scientist or reading a particular popularization article, we realize that these were simplifications of language, which do not correspond to reality. However, these simplifications only make things more complicated, because they introduce misconceptions that sometimes do more harm than good. It is not "angry" to give a more real vision of things, if it is done with politeness and arguments, perhaps sometimes clumsy, I do not claim to be a scientist.

38. Philip 6 says:

Thank you.  I've always wondered why a rotational Station hasn't been done.. yet.    Of coarse, in space, the 'Spokes' could be 100th the size.. etc.   Anyway, by the time we brought it up there, the Ball Reactor in Nevada, you know, the one that 'repels' human touch.. it might be revealed by then and then people would say.. FU**, why didn't you show us THIS back in 2012?

39. Jesse Petrone says:

Centrifugal is not a real force but a psudoforce. They say its not real but they mean its not real gravity, not that it wont work. You have over 2 million views on this vid? Thats beyond my comprehention.

40. Jesse Petrone says:

Only watch this vid if you want to know how physics DOESNT work. Jeez man this guy is an asshat.

41. Chris says:

it's a far cry from regular gravity. release a pebble mid-air in such a spinner and the pebble stays in that position, not falling.
cant we make micro black holes yet?

42. David Henningson says:

Bill Gates… the default unit of currency… for everything astronomical ?

43. kuip tek says:

Thanks for the interesting video. What about the counter-rotation problem? The same facing helicopters, as the total rotational momentum should be zero in an isolated system. Maybe in odessy 2001 they had to show 2 parts rotating oppositely. Huum, I have to rewatch the movie 😉

44. Joe Marshall says:

cen-TRI-fuh gal force

45. Pavel Mynařík says:

I have calculated the size once and to have difference: 0,1 m2/s of "gravitational" acceleration between legs and head of a virtual 2m (6,5ft) high person, we would have to have station with 200m (656ft) radius.

46. Patrick Vosloo says:

did one of the 2.3 million viewers consider that centrifugal force cannot exist outside of a gravity field…..?

47. Kirk Johnson says:

Sure , lets turn this planet into a polluted bankrupt ball of poison so that we can put some condos in space.

48. Kirk Johnson says:

Too bad there isn't already a large ball of rock rotating in an orbit around earth- we could build on THAT.

49. rutr wer says:

We could use Kevlar carbon baloon

50. Blaster Elforg says:

Every pet mouse running inside the cart wheel wheel knows the answer.

51. Susan Fudge says:

NASA can and does pretend to.

52. TheCarMan says:

Why do we always have to assume that making a large diameter rotating enclosure be of continuous mass? Why can't we simply position two equivalent masses connected by a long cable (or hollow tube in which one can traverse between them) and then set them in rotational motion? The distance between them can therefore be as long as you want with minimal expense.

53. AcresceNtRMoonT says:

I like to imagine we figure out how to generate strong sustained propulsion over long distances such that, once in space, a ship will be in constant acceleration of 9.8 m/s. When the ship is just over halfway to its destination, the ship will swivel and now decelerate at 9.8 m/s. On long haul flights to other planets or interstellar travel, you could theoretically be on earth-like gravity for most of the journey and hit very high speeds by midflight. The science behind the sustained fuel supply would be rather impractical though…

54. Paul Schuyler says:

I really like the video and I’m convinced that (the lack of) a viable artificial gravity solution is the primary obstacle preventing humanity from becoming a space-fairing civilization. Without gravity, even the finest ship is inherently hostile to life In all other areas we are making rapid progress. However there are many obstacles with the centrifugal option not highlighted here. For example the need for symmetry (ballast) at all times, especially if the ship is moving toward a destination, to prevent wobble. Is it possible to create a spinning ‘hammer’ (ship on one end, ballast on the other?). How does this affect navigation? Likewise, what options exist beyond these daunting mechanical solutions? Is there any known technology for creating true artificial gravity aside from this mechanical approach(gravity boots, magnetism, etc)? This challenge is the true reason we don’t have bases on other planets and won’t in the foreseeable future.

55. Peter Lemmon says:

Stop spraying the earth’s atmosphere with aluminum, barium and strontium and you will have more than enough aluminum to use in space projects — “Waist not, Want not,” commanded Jesus.

56. Melih Yimer says:

So would 300 meter in diameter be enough to hold the blood circulation normal would much of the blood still go to your legs?

57. hey guys its me says:

So first we need an orbital factory to gather and process material from the space

58. Hendo says:

Watch the Bob Lazar interview with Joe Rogan…

59. LUCIFER BELSEBUB says:

Only problem to harvest aluminum on moon as you say , is we can not get there . We have not been there and will probably never get there either.

60. That Meme says:

Man.. we need to all get together build a mining and launch base on the moon. Hit mars on our way out the solar system.

61. gowd sake says:

Dump a couple of trillion tons of gravel into space, wait a few million years job done !

62. Thomas JR. says:

Aluminum, you are pronouncing wrong.

63. Thomas JR. says:

Omg, your pronunciation sucks (appreciate and now aluminum.) Help others learn by not mispronouncing.

64. Il babbione errante says:

But what if money is not an issue? *proceeds to talk about money*.

65. jntaylor29 says:

Just fill it up with air, everything heavier will fall everything lighter than air will float. Gravity is irrelevant/non-existent. Look at the periodic table. Almost everything is heavier that the molecules that make up air.

66. Derek H Troop says:

But that is NOT gravity.

67. nothing at all says:

Is it juz me or did he juz say falcon 9 heavy?

68. G6 LG says:

But 007 destroyed it

69. John smith says:

Creating Gravity mechanically is not efficient. You must create gravity using Physics.

70. Neel Waghmare says:

Vegeta has joined the chat

71. Neel Waghmare says:

I wonder if the earth stops spinning (without considering Sun's any gravitational effect), would the gravity be more effective on us

72. Ashish Patole says:

360° Artificial Rotational Wheel may more efficient than traditional wheel, Long live mother land…! ??

73. Y**** M says:

Just 1 ttillion? The us spends just as much on military

74. Iguana Pete says:

it's not "centra-fugal" force… It is "cen·trif·u·gal" force.

75. Saiah smeth says:

Suprised tomnit see the so called “angry mobs” in the comments section?

76. Bro Jedi Chuck says:

As the mass of human body in space is close to none and the gravity of any ship will be close to none then it's not possible to create the centrifugal force based artificial gravity. The body will float no matter how fast the structure will spin.

77. Roger Valor says:

elysium: no jumping to techno

78. Dave B says:

I can't ask a question as I just closed my useless Twitter account.

79. Daniel Večeřa says:

With what frequency would Elysium need to rotate to have a earth like gravity?

80. Sean Thompson says:

Wouldn't two small crafts tethered together be much cheaper than a ring?

81. Dave Rouse says:

As an A level student many years ago, I remember the physics teacher saying ‘there is no such thing as centrifugal force, it is actually centripetal force’.

82. maq says:

We could put a test station with artificilal into space very cheaply. Just use a long tether with a counterweight. It would be a great test bed to see the effect on humans.

83. Irving Kurlinski says:

A cheaper and feasible way of making a viable space station w/gravity is change the shape.

I really don't understand the argument that the space station must be huge. A smaller spinning space station would not have as good a fake gravity as a a huge one, but it would still be a whole lot better than zero G.
And the space station need not be a spinning disk. Two separate masses connected by a truss or cable spinning would work just fine.

85. Onward Christian Soldier's Steven says:

They could use balloons like they already do. Not to mention anti-gravity ships like the tr3b and the Aurora type of ships. I forget what the giant Boomerang shaped ones are called right now. They already have them up there anyway. Do a little research jerk. LOL.

86. smallstars says:

Hey thanks so much for making this video. It really inspired me and helped me come up with my concept for artificial gravity for the SpaceX Starship. Let me know what you think: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CRiJTJikjk&

87. Naveen Jai says:

Prices can be controlled, just don't pay rather make it a obligation to agencies to accomplish it. Or make it though crowdfunding..just offer the fund fillers some amount of time in ratio of their donation to this project monetarily or volunterly

88. Matthew Collett says:

If you had water in a hamster wheel made of wood planks, the water would not follow around the wheel dude. It would float off that wood. No matter which way or how fast its going. If gravity were involved it would just sit and splash around towards the botom of the wheel, it wouldnt go up and around

89. Matthew Collett says:

No force is pushing from the center of the comet to the outter wall

90. EnderCrypt says:

wait what.. why would anyone say centrifugal force isnt real?

91. Jacob Hendrickson says:

I always thought to have centrifugal force you would have to have gravity.

92. Mr. Sandvich says:

Sigma: *laughs in dutsch*

93. J McClain says:

Considering that the U.S. is 22 trillion in debt, seems like a worthwhile project. At least there would be something to show for all that money.

94. Teemu Myyryläinen says:

For someone called Real engineering… at least do your math right would be an start… for second .. you lost countless variables in your estimate as well… so even if the math was right.. for part you thought of , would still be miles and miles off as missing variables not in counted for ….

Just sad… 2mil subs,, and cant do math on channel that generally is about math and its applications in real world.. the state of U.S schooling system… and hardly anyone even noticed your mistakes… even more sad..

95. Guerilla Guru says:

Uh but, in space this doesn't work if you jump you'll fly to the other side of the wheel. Water doesn't fall and float . An air hockey table floor that suck will have the idea of gravity

96. Guy and a Grilled Cheese says:

No. The answer is no. I didn’t need an engineer in degree to figure that out either.

97. jbstepchild says:

Why would tortoise travel to space I can't figure this out

98. troy5007 says:

He is on wires?

99. J B says:

I say stick to radio controlled robotics for now.
We still have yet to learn how to live in harmony with the environment of earth, and with eachother.

No sense in leaving home. Space is too big, and the human lifespan too short.

100. Emre Ozcelik says:

Astroid mining + 3-D Printing