Whistleblower, Epstein Story, Mexico Murders – Your AMAC Weekly News
0 Comments


Hi I’m Ben Ferguson and welcome to Your
AMAC Weekly News. First up, members of the GOP and the president are calling for
the release of the whistleblower’s identity, who claimed a quid pro quo was
happening between Donald Trump and the new President of Ukraine. Well now
liberals are claiming this is, quote, “a very dangerous situation” if you name the
person who is the leaker, yet in the past Democrats have leaked names of anyone
who they did not like serving in our government, more on that in a moment.
Up next, footage of an ABC reporter services placing ABC News under the
microscope. Now this footage shows the reporter complaining that the network
literally killed a story about alleged sexual misconduct by Jeffrey Epstein
back in 2015. More on what the network is saying about this in a minute. And
finally, nine Americans were killed and seven children were injured by a Mexican
drug cartel in Mexico. Questions of why this happened and what this would mean
as far as a military action being called from the president is now coming to the
debate table, more on that important story in just a moment. A quick reminder,
please share this video with your friends right now on social media. Your
AMAC Weekly News starts right now. Shocker here, big breaking news, liberals
are mad about something involving impeachment. Now are they mad about the
fact that the president is being unfairly treated by liberals in Congress?
No. Are they mad that liberals in Congress are wasting precious time and
insane amounts of taxpayers dollars chasing a fake news story? The answer: no.
Are they mad because Senator Rand Paul said that the name of the whistleblower
needs to be released? Yep that’s right, that’s now what they’re losing their
minds over. They’re mad because Senator Paul believes the president should
actually be able to face his accuser. Listen to Paul from the president’s most
recent rally aired on CNN. The whistleblower needs to come before
Congress as a material witness because he worked for Joe Biden at the same time
Hunter Biden was getting money from corrupt oligarchs. I say tonight to the
media do your job and print his name. Liberals are losing their minds over
this they are calling it, quote, “very dangerous, deeply troubling, and bullying.”
Listen to what Representative Jamie Raskin said in an interview on CNN about
this exact subject. What do you say to Senator Rand Paul? I mean very dangerous
stuff to be scapegoating and targeting the whistleblower. The whistleblower is
an irrelevant distraction at this point because the whistleblower was the person
who said, and remember the president emphasized this, “I don’t have first-hand
knowledge of any of this but I’ve been told a series of things by people who
were involved.” All of those people, or not all of them but lots of them, have come
forward very bravely over the threats of the White House to testify precisely
about what they knew. So let me get this straight,
liberals are saying that this whistleblower, the one who got all of
this started is no longer relevant or important. Well, he is, he’s the reason why
we are in this entire mess in the first place. Now of course he is important. Now
Raskin isn’t the only one saying the whistleblower is no longer relevant to
any of the discussion. Representative Ted Lieu also said this in an
interview on MSNBC. So we know that the whistleblower’s identity is no longer relevant
because everything he said has now been corroborated by other witnesses. Now to be very clear,
the whistleblower who has become the Liberals pride and joy is now
considered by them to be irrelevant. Now if he is irrelevant,
then isn’t the entire impeachment inquiry irrelevant as well? Now Senator
Paul didn’t stop by just saying what he said at the rally.
Paul thoroughly believes, like we all should, that if there is a trial then the
President of the United States of America has every right to confront his accuser.
Listen to how he explained it on Fox News. The statute says the Inspector
General can’t reveal the name, there’s nothing that prevents me from saying it
now other than that I want it to be more about the process and less about the
person, but there’s no law that prevents me from mentioning the name of who’s
been said to be the whistleblower. But there’s — [Reporter] But you’re convinced you know? [Paul] Yeah. And
there’s something important also, it’s called the Constitution. The Sixth
Amendment to the Constitution says if you are going to accuse me of a crime I
get to stare you down in court. That is absolutely part of the Constitution. The
statute might say one thing but I promise you if there is a trial,
you always get to confront your accuser. It’s in the Sixth Amendment, it’s in the
Bill of Rights, there’s no way they can stop the defense from asking. Now it’s very clear in the Constitution and it says that the president will have
every right to face down his accuser if this goes to trial. Not only does it say
that the president will have the right to, quoting directly from the actual
Constitution it says, quote, “be confronted with the witness against him.” That’s in
the Constitution. Now, he also enjoys the right to, quote,
“have a compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.” That means that
whether the liberals like it or not, the president has every right to know who
the whistleblower is and to have his own witnesses testify on his behalf. So you
see one thing that the liberals aren’t lying about is that they are offering
the president the same impeachment rules offered to Nixon or Clinton. What really
happened is that at the very last minute Section F was quietly devised by the
Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler. Now let me explain to you why
Section F is so important. It stipulates, and unless
the president surrenders executive privilege, a power even the Supreme Court
has ruled as vital to that office, that the president and his lawyers will be
denied any ability to call or question witnesses. So, if anything, this is a
direct violation of the Constitution. Now liberals are trying to take away
every constitutional right that Donald Trump has to prove his innocence. They
have completely destroyed the idea of innocent until proven guilty and even
more than that they are trying to discredit the results of a free and fair
election voted on by the American people. So we have to put an end to their reign
of tyranny, which is exactly why AMAC is fighting for you on Capitol Hill every
day to make sure that your vote and your voice is not silenced in this process. In one of the most shocking stories
that we’ve seen in years, ABC News is now under fire because of a
video that was leaked of an ABC News anchor Amy Robach discussing how the
network killed her bombshell story about Jeffrey Epstein three years ago. I want
you to take a listen to what Robach had to say complaining about how her boss
has handled an interview with an Epstein accuser brought forward by Project
Veritas, take a look. I’ve had the story for three years. I’ve had this interview
with Virginia Roberts. We would not put it on the air. First of all, I was told,
who’s Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows who that is. This is a stupid story. Then the
Palace found out that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and
threatened us a million different ways. We were so afraid we wouldn’t be able to
interview Kate and Will that we, that also quashed the story. And then — and then
Alan Dershowitz was also implicated in, because of the planes — she told me
everything. She had pictures she had everything. She was in hiding for 12
years. We convinced her to come out, we convinced her to talk to us.
It was unbelievable what we had, Clinton, we had everything. I tried for three years to
get it on to no avail, and now it’s all coming out and it’s like these new
revelations and I freaking had on all of it. I’m so pissed right now. Like everyday I get more and more pissed cuz I’m just like, oh my God, we — it was what —
what we had was unreal. Other women backing it up. Hey. Yep. Brad Edwards the
attorney, three years ago saying like there will come a day where
we will realize Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has
ever known. I had it all three years ago. I want you to think about the time frame
we’re talking about here. We’re talking about three years that this went
unreported. I want you to think about all of the horrific things that Epstein was
able to do during those three years and ABC News did nothing to stop him. They
did not call the police or authorities in any capacity either. They apparently
knew everything. ABC put out a statement from Robach
saying, quote, “As the Epstein story story continued to unfold
last summer, I was caught in a private moment of frustration. I was upset that
an important interview I had conducted with Virginia Roberts didn’t air because
we could not obtain sufficient corroborating evidence to meet ABC’s
editorial standards about her allegations.” Now, Robach literally said,
quote, “we could not obtain sufficient corroborating evidence to meet ABC’s
editorial standards,” after we already know she had interviews and
corroborating evidence that would have opened the eyes of officials and what
Epstein was doing to countless victims. I’m sorry but the standard of ABC News
that they claim they use to vet stories, well they’re a complete lie. ABC has a
history of jumping on other stories that are completely uncorroborated and not
factual at all if they are against conservatives. For example, calling Brett
Kavanaugh a gang rapist, reporting Trump colluded with Putin, and the fake racism
story about Covington High School student Nick Sandman who is now having
to clear his name by suing news organizations. All of these were aired
virtually immediately, yet a story that was corroborated with pictures and
interviews and research and to one of the men who could be one of the most
prolific pedophiles our country will ever know, is never aired by ABC News. Now
Judge Jeanine on Fox had this to say about ABC News’ claims of their standards,
take a look. I don’t understand why NBC, ABC, all of these people are interested
in protecting a pedophile. And by the way, they — she comes out with this statement
explaining it saying, you know, I never really stopped working on it and we just
didn’t have the standards, we couldn’t corroborate.
That’s like saying to a rape victim — [Hannity] That’s not what she’s saying. But look,
she’s caught between a rock and a hard place because they’re saying, “Amy you like your
job here?” [Jeanine] No but — but what I’m saying that ABC is making that excuse as well, they’re
saying they didn’t have sufficient corroboration. The truth is that they had
gotten those plane logs that would have them. The truth is that Acosta had the case from 2005 in Florida. There was all kinds
of corroboration down there and if they said that they would have done it but
they just didn’t have enough, what have they been doing for the past three years?
They haven’t done anything on it, and now they said they’re gonna do something
next year. Amy Robach, I’m very proud of her, it’s ABC that I’m talking about. To be clear this is what happens when the mainstream media is given full power
to decide what they believe is important to Americans. They would rather air fake
news stories than the ones that are actually verified and could have saved
countless victims if it was aired three years ago. Now the only way to end this
is to make our voices heard. We need to let the mainstream media know that they
need to tell us a truth and that is exactly what AMAC is fighting for everyday. This past week at least six children and three women living in a Mormon
offshoot community of US citizens in Mexico were shot and burned to death.
Seven children survived but were left injured, while another
initially went missing. Now this took place after their convoy came
under fire during a daylight ambush believed have been carried out by gunmen
from a Mexican drug cartel. Take a look at this footage that aired on Fox News. Survivors say they were members of a Mormon family living in Mexico with dual
US citizenship. They were reportedly driving when they were ambushed by
what’s believed to be a cartel, some of their bodies were found in this SUV set
on fire and riddled with bullet holes. One family relative saying that he saw
the attack and the dozens of heavily armed men were standing around the
burning SUV. One claiming that there were others kidnapped, but another relative
told a reporter that they’re all accounted for so it’s a very fluid
situation. Mexican National Guard, police, and military forces have been dispatched
overnight searching in several operations. Now the area where the attack
took place is located less than a hundred miles from America, from the
Arizona border, and is consistently under a dispute with several different cartels,
which means bloodshed. Now, there are many theories surfacing about why this family
was targeted. There have been at least one arrest made in
connection with this horrific event. Now what we do know is that it is definitely
involving the drug cartels that are basically controlling Mexico and its
government. About 200 shell casings of 223- and 77-millimeter
caliber guns were found on the scene. President Trump
has been offering up as support to Mexico in light of the
murders. He tweeted out, quote, “this is time for
Mexico, with the help of the United States, to wage war on the drug cartels
and wipe them off the face of the earth. We merely await a call from your great
new president. Now this all comes less than a month after soldiers surrendered
El Chapo’s son. Now El Chapo is a former cartel leader and during the time in
which his son was captured by government forces, the cartel literally terrorized a
city in Mexico where they grabbed him. So the cartel started raging war in that
city and then the President of Mexico decided, I don’t want to be a part of
this, so he released El Chapo’s son back to the cartel to stop the violence. No
I’m not kidding. The President of Mexico is literally allowing the cartels to run
his country. Now they’re calling the shots and the government is the one
that’s doing their dirty work. These cartels are dangerous and they are
deadly. They are not only dangerous because of the acts they commit similar
to what happened to the poor American families that were hit this week, but
they’re dangerous because of the drugs that they are bringing in to the United
States, plus all the human trafficking. Now President Trump has already offered
his services to Mexico to fight these cartels, but the President of Mexico has
repeatedly said he wants to end the war with the cartels. That is right, as the
leader of Mexico, he has come out and said that he is not going to protect the
citizens, he’s not going to protect the borders either, if it means any conflict
with the cartels. Now with all of this violence spilling out of Mexico you
understand why Trump has made building a border wall a priority of his
administration. We must make it harder for these cross-border criminals to
operate and smuggle drugs and violence in and out of America. That’s it for this
edition of Your AMAC Weekly News. Now be sure to share
this post with your family and friends on social media. Also a quick reminder, if
you haven’t joined AMAC or renewed your membership do it now so you can continue
to receive this show and access to our incredible member benefits that also
include our AMAC Magazine. Most importantly, AMAC is fighting and
representing more than 2 million conservatives just like you every day on
Capitol Hill, so make sure you join or renew today. I’m Ben Ferguson I’ll see
you back next week for our next episode

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *